Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31256456-20181228061901/@comment-28112409-20190123042148

Pokechurin wrote: Is it though? That's the question. Generally, more people to judge, the better. Esp. seeing as there are people who do have valuable opinions on this wiki about who deserves ToTM. Having a mix of staff+users ensures we can see multiple perspectives as long as the users really do care about opinions on the best user.

Thanks for responding. Objectivity is doesn't always need to be ironed out via numbers. The staff are not a bunch of apes, they know how to differentiate between people voted for social status and others voted for substantial contribution.

What if one of the judges is actually one of the users who are deserving of the TotM title? What do you do then? Again, you still haven't figured out how you're gonna nominate and identify "reliable" users to judge for TotM. I see no need for it regardless, the staff are trustworthy enough.