Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27575896-20170927192006/@comment-33686221-20170928153209

ZedKiller13 wrote: This is a slate and not going to instanty be added in.

'''You get one vote only. '''The vote is re-funded if the user you voted on is currently not eligible. This would lower the hassle to count the votes and have people focus on who they actually think should win.

This would also stop people voting for friends and more for people who deserve it.

'''You can nominate one person, but it does NOT count as a vote. You can also nominate anyone that isn't eligible, and vote for them later.''' This would balance the fact if a nomination counted as a vote, they can't do anything else in ToTM. You can vote for the person you nominated, or you can nominate someone and vote for someone else if you feel such.

'''Y-E-S. That way more people can at least be recognised.'''

'''You must require either 30 mainspace edits, helpful role idea reviews, good responses to questions on the Ask Questions board, or a mix of the three. '''Because it is from the current month and the month prior, it would give users a more feeling to help out around the wiki.

'''(rip me) I like this idea. Nothing more I can say.'''

'''You must have at least have made an edit or post for the last month. '''This shows that the user is active and helps out around the wiki or just stays active.

Doesnt that come under the last one?

'You must not have a large'' history of previous bans or vandal edits on the wiki. '''Users found to have a large and previous vandal/ban history are not allowed into ToTM. Exceptions would include if it was a one time thing and they turned around and helped out the wiki.

I would say more than two would mean large tbh.



To agree, type either a /support, /agree, or anything related.

/AGREEEEEEEE