Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31256456-20181228061901/@comment-31256456-20190117074945

My god, should've mentioned that point earlier, that one is SO common.

In general a lot of stupid criticisms focus on saying "lol this doesn't follow the rules". Here's an example of a bad vs. good example of reasoning.

"This role is bad because it autoconfirms"

This is bad because it doesn't offer the user any context or info either than a vague rule that they may not understand.

"This role does autoconfirm, which can work in some cases, however, unfortunately in this case, it doesn't work. This is because roles that...."

This is better because it explains why the rule is put in place and why it makes a difference and works.

So yeah, I'm totally up for discussing that as well.