Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-30255850-20171015211902/@comment-32881402-20171021203908

If it is completely beyond saving and defending, lock the thread - isn't that your job as a Discussions Moderator? What is the point of keeping the thread open if it is beyond saving? Post the link of making roles, lock the thread. Done. It implies that the role is beyond saving. If they wish to re-open it, they contact you, giving a half-decent explanation as to why there is some merit in the role. If it passes, re-open the thread. If it doesn't, tell them harshly and bluntly why it won't ever work - they asked for it by responding.



Saying 'REJECTED' can be really demoralising and doesn't motivate the creator to share new ideas. Harsh reviewing = / = REJECTED

Harsh reviewing is using stronger points and picking on most faults.

Volf049 wrote: Like rubik said, op survivor rehash. EJECTED This. It gives no extra feedback and demoralizes the creator. Does this even remotely help? No. I actually can't take this post seriously, because it says 'ejected', but no matter; it still proves my point. What he said has been said before. His additional comment was unnecessary and unhelpful.

The role itself is a survivor rehash. Honestly it might work as a Survivor rework (because Surv does need changing). Though there are other problems that have been listed above. Big problems.