Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-30255850-20171015211902/@comment-31680260-20171022092951

ProfessorArceus wrote: I wasn't. I'm not here to terrorize the Wiki, I'm here to be a part of it. My point still stands; saying REJECTED over and over again doesn't help the cause. The post was directed at the Moderator, suggesting better ways to deal with situations. The Moderator just sent them a link to another page, without explaining why the role wouldn't work. How should they know, in future, what is good and what is not? They might have read the link already, but needed someone to point out why the role wouldn't work. Sometimes, reading one thing over and over again just doesn't help and you need someone - a Moderator, preferably - to tell you why it doesn't work.

Linking a page = / = Explaining why the role is bad We're working on all that. It's even an unofficial rule that you don't reject a role without reason. "Rejected" without proper reason doesn't count towards ToTM edits, either.