Board Thread:Off-Topic Posts/@comment-33167183-20180421045135/@comment-26234016-20180424001105

'''lright then, so why am I not seeing this on mainstream media? If feminism was advocating for sharia law to be removed, then why havent I seen it in my local feminist frequency thread?'''

You have a... feminist frequency thread? I just use tumblr... it's a lot easier... I don't know what exactly your argument here is if you say "I haven't heard about people who are localized to my (assumedly Western) area talk about something that isn't relevant here".

http://bravetheworld.com/2016/08/09/50-real-differences-men-women/

Now, I'm going to start out by saying that this blog literally says in its statement page that it supports Authoritarianism, so take that with a grain of salt. But it does say that "girls focus on relationship building" which actually seems like the perfect focus for a politican. So, if you're saying women are biologically unable to or biologicall worse at becoming politicans, this source won't work for that.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/killallmen?lang=en

Um, I would list people in that tag into one of three categories. There are the people who are using it for shock and awe in order to make change. In poor taste? Threatening? Should not have happened? Definitely. But so was Lyndon B. Johnson's "Daisy" ad, and it got him into office.

The second category are TERFs. We can move on, I've already covered that.

The third category, and largest category, are non-Feminists using the tag to blacken Feminists. I can sort of see why, with a tag like #killallmen it's almost low-hanging fruit.

'''Again, that doesnt mean oppression, and it doesnt call for feminism. None of this calls for feminism at all. What it did call for is debates, not an agenda stuffed in.'''

It doesn't necessarily mean oppression, sure. It does mean imbalance, which means Feminism. Feminism is a school of thought still very relevant. You can't have debates without an agenda. You can't argue for something without having a cause for it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xJI4zYR5o8

One... one ad... that is dumb and ridiculous... is not feminism.

That series of videos, concluding with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp1K7f7WNCo

Look, I'll be honest. I only watched the first few seconds of the first two videos. It's a series of videos to show a bad side to feminism. Is what it was supposed to be, I think? But that first clip in the first video was a woman talking about harrassment online which is something different, and the second video was about a dude making fun of male feminism, which I think is interesting because they're admitting and bringing light to a oft-underlooked aspect of feminism that should be brought to attention.

You still aren't proving anything. Let me give you a link about egalitarianism:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Egalitarianism

That doesn't prove anything. It's from a biased source and it has a biased message. Albeit, I enjoy reading RationalWiki but I'd never use it in an argument. You using YouTube videos is... much more unreliable.

While the majority of people advocate for equality, only 1/5 are saying that they are a feminist.

Well, of course people would like to say they advocate for equality. Imagine walking into a room and going, "You know what, when you think about it, maybe some races ARE inferior."

I don't know what you're trying to say with that poll.

But it isnt needed.

But it is.