Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27575896-20170927192006/@comment-27575896-20170927193255

Anons unite wrote: ZedKiller13 wrote: This is a slate and not going to instanty be added in.

'''You get one vote only. '''The vote is re-funded if the user you voted on is currently not eligible. This would lower the hassle to count the votes and have people focus on who they actually think should win.

yeah I like this idea, it would make people think about who really to vote for.

You can nominate one person, but it does NOT count as a vote. This would balance the fact if a nomination counted as a vote, they can't do anything else in ToTM.

This doesnt make any sense, because if you nominate someone, you would vote for them anyway.

'''You must require either 30 mainspace edits, 30 helpful role idea reviews, 30 good responses to questions on the Ask Questions board, or a mix of the three. '''Because it is from the current month and the month prior, it would give users a more feeling to help out around the wiki.

'''Yup yup yup. no problems here.'''

'''You must have at least have made an edit or post for the last two months. '''This shows that the user is active and helps out around the wiki or just stays active.

also no problem with this one.

'''You must not have a history of previous bans or vandal edits on the wiki. '''Users found to have either of these are prevented from entering ToTM or voting.

I do not agree with this one, people can always turn around and become a good user

For your questions:

1: Not always. Some people may nominate someone but vote for another. They can vote for the same person anyway if they want to.

2: Not every user who has been banned or has vandalized turns around good again. Usually they either resume vandalizing and get banned for longer, or they go to some other wiki to do the same. Very rarely to banned and vandalicious users turn good and start helping out the wiki a lot.