Board Thread:Role Ideas (Town)/@comment-33966114-20180401143548/@comment-27575896-20180406203450

I have a serious issue with this form of reviewing. This user has created past role ideas that were rejected without any links period to how to correctly create a role, so I don't see how this user would improve. Becoming shut down without much possibility doesn't help anyone, now does it?

Reviews are supposed to be 'crticial but informative and helpful feedback. 'If all you are going to be throwing out everything that can be a problem with an idea, then leave it. "If you have nothing nice to say, then don't say it." Jamal was the positive one here by helping out. You can be serious about your reviewing like Vert, but Vert gives feedback and criticism. Not blantant statings of errors in the role. Newbies are newbies. They have no idea how we run things here until they actually do something. This form of reviewing can easily lessen down morale and can prevent new people from coming back to the wiki as their one or two role ideas were instantly shut down and deemed evil for no apparent reason.

Remember, people can be on mobile which can explain the bad spelling. Consigliere is annoying to spell for first timers, and pre-ToS users may have it autocorrect to Consort as that's easy.

...anyway, for future reference on how to successfully create roles, use this page: [Making New Roles]. It's a great tool for future reviews!