Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171002223259/@comment-31680260-20171007013438

Addfire wrote: Jallybwan wrote: DesertStorm11 wrote:

Jallybwan wrote:

Sometimes there are. It might affect the game slightly, but it's still a game of teamwork and the outcome ALWAYS depends on the players, regardless of roles. I've seen a Medium lead the Town with the help of a dead blackmailed Sheriff. A MEDIUM and a SHERIFF, two of the most worthless roles in the game.

This offends me. Sheriff and Medium are underrated. If people learned to play them right and people would stop hating on them, then they could be two of the more powerful roles in the game, like they're MEANT to be I did that to draw you out tbh That's my point! It doesn't matter what people think of the role, since any role can become the MVP of the Town. It's all about how you play the role, which you backed up just there. THEN QUIT TALKING ABOUT WHICH TEAM HAS BETTER ROLES *takes deep breaths* I'm calm now. Well what else do we talk about? The roles themselves are literally the core of this debate, since any team can have smart players. There's no way to gauge the skill of the people playing, so we have to debate over the next best thing. While you could make the argument that some roles provide better teamwork or something, that's still talking about the roles. The heart of the debate is essentially "which team's roles better screw over the Town?"