Thread:Jallybwan/@comment-32783587-20180109025223/@comment-26234016-20180215234423

Anons unite wrote: what i mean is that what logically seems correct is better then faith in god despite it being incorrect.

and actually, a world of athiests would be better. do i really have to be scared of suffering forever to be a good person? im a good person for goodness' sake. also, a world of athiests would have no extremes that misname god. athiests would focus on science instead of churches as well. im not saying those extremes are in any way good people, but it proves that the rules are kinda bs, make what happens on earth  more important, because people think "ok ill fuck up here but ill just choose heaven" Just going to point out that you used the phrase "for goodness sake" which is an inprofane way of saying "for Christ's sake"

And while you might be a good person, not everyone is. If everyone was an atheist, then it stands to follow that the people who require guidance- wouldn't get it! (Again, I'm not saying followers of a religion are sheep or the opiated masses or whatever, but personally, without some moral guidance, I'd be long dead.) For instance, my grandparents have suffered too much. They lost a large chunk of their children in a plane crash, and how did they seek solace? Through religion. Through Christianity specifically, in fact.

Religion is equally as important as science. We all need a moral compass, and religion provides one.