Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171002232846/@comment-32421214-20171028232629

ProfessorArceus wrote: Raven1207 wrote: ProfessorArceus wrote: Raven1207 wrote: ProfessorArceus wrote:

Raven1207 wrote:

ProfessorArceus wrote: Neutral can't be included. Neutral isn't a united faction. That debate would fall apart on so many levels because of neutrals. Yeah but you could debate if it's good or not since it has most diverse group. Let's grab a Kirize post for this:

I didn't know you could contradict yourself in one sentence. Oh hush you. I meant that how NKs and NC(minus Pirate) can't win with each other unless they are the same kind of NK and NC(minus Pirate)  That's still more than 1 faction, though. is its own faction, is its own faction and so is. You can't really debate about as a single faction. Are you helping or against my arguement? Against. My point is that they're too different to be considered a single faction. You can't debate on whether it as a whole is a good faction. You can compare the alignments individually, but I wouldn't start a debate on whether or not Neutrals are a good faction. As a faction, they're awful. You're saying that you can debate about the faction as a whole BECAUSE it's so seperated. And that's just wrong. Yeah but you could debate on NC roles vs NK roles. Or how about comparing the roles from Neutrals to others.