Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31256456-20181228061901/@comment-35930675-20181230210321

Role Ideas:

I don't think it's always the reviewer's fault here honestly. If the OP doesn't give you anything to work with, you can't really do anything but give your criticism and say "Rejected". I mean, you can give some suggestions, but those are not always easy to do when someone makes a role like "Serial Killer Hunter".

"Reviewer: This role is a complete abomination. It doesn't work, it has no creativity, and really has nothing to do with the game I know and love, Town of Salem Coven Edition."

No one really says this at all unless the role is indeed, an abomination. (See my first paragraph). Fine, people say roles don't work, but what's wrong with that? It's ok as long as you give a decent explanation to WHY it doesn't work. In some cases, that isn't even required because a role is utterly ridiculously.

"Reviewer: Wow, we see way too many of these garbage roles, seriously. Alright now I'll go make a critical paragraph about it that gives no way to improve your idea."

I mean, can't really argue with ya there, but still, sometimes it is impossible to improve a role.