Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32709703-20170731141251/@comment-27819321-20170731143807

So, it's toxic, huh? Sudden turn of events! So, I have a question: How does a rejected role warrant a wiki to be claimed as toxic?

I have some explanation to do here, as I can obviously see. If you're going to go out and about with a community being toxic, at least have good grammar! I don't want 5-year-old grammar dissing this, because 5-year-old grammar isn't strong. I would much appreciate that you would tell us why it's toxic and horrible. Oh, wait! You're doing this out of rage.

Anyways, lemme explain. Many roles are rejected on here, because game developement is hard. We need this game to be balanced and although we cannot do it completely, we will take out roles that cannot make it. Our order of operations for role ideas if you do decide to post them heree would go in an orderly fashion like this.

1. You post your role.

2. Your role gets rejected/accepted. Either way, you can bring it up to BMG, but if it gets rejected, take in note you might be wasting the developers time if you're submitting in a rejected role. It shows that it probably doesn't have much chance.

3. You wait until it either gets put into the game. None of the roles that we have accepted and/or rejected has made it up, and this is very rare. So be prepared for your role to get smashed!

Now that you understand, I hope you can enjoy this wiki and not be blinded by salt. It must be thick salt-if you're blinded this much by it to not even see your keyboard so you can type language.