Thread:Orecreeper/@comment-32651233-20190126211828/@comment-32651233-20190127220413

Vertroyer wrote:

'''Opinions are biased, they are subjective, they are not necessarily based on fact or knowledge, they can be ignorant until they are informed of otherwise, that's why they're opinions and that's why they constantly differ even when one side is proven wrong. You literally said they're not biased at the start of the post only to adopt that bias and say it's fine? Despite the contradiction, your logic goes both sides anyway. Here look, just because you think someone is helpful on the wikia means they are helpful? The other side can be just as biased as the next one, it's not mutually exclusive.'''

Additionally, I wasn't even asking about TotM. I was asking about the Making New Roles page argument. "prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair" is the definition of bias.

If you think someone is helpful, you have the right to vote for them. That is not bias because 1)it isn't prejudice, you aren't judging a book by its fucking cover, you just see someone as the most worthy and helpful person for ToTM, 2) its not unfair, you can't simply just expect everyone to have the same idea and definition of helpful because many factors can influence that. Take for example, if you mostly hang around the role ideas boards, you will only see frequent active role reviewers as helpful because you don't visit the other boards quite as much, so you really only see a select group of people being helpful on a day-to-day basis.

Oh and sorry about that last part XD I thought you were referring to the Totm points. Make it more clear next time lol.