Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-30255850-20171015211902/@comment-26234016-20171019150434

HereThereEverywhere wrote: In general, no NB should really have a Survivor goal. They'll either be a better Surv, a worse Surv, or pretty much the same as Surv. If it's the same, it serves no real purpose and doesn't really need to exist, since it's pretty much just Survivor. If it's better or worse, than luck will determine whether you get the easy time as the better role, or the harder time as the worse role. When I say better/worse Surv, I mean a role that has the same goal as Survivor, and thus is going to play similarly. However, if it's night abilities are better than just vesting, then you'll want that role instead of Survivor. If it's night abilities are worse than Survivor, then you'll want Survivor. However, it would be up to luck whether or not you actually get it. I know luck factors into things like whether you get Town or the NK, but that can't be avoided. However, roles of the same alignment should be around the same winrate so one being "better" should only be subjective.

Also, can people please stop putting things like "REJECTED" at the bottom of their posts? If your opinion can't be categorized easily into "rejecting" or "accepting" the idea, then is your opinion really worth posting? It's just obnoxious and lazy. It helps sum up opinions for the creator and other reviewers to see who's on what side of the role, and rejecting roles has been around for as long as reviewing roles have been. It's not gonna stop.