Thread:Pokechurin/@comment-28112409-20171029192326/@comment-31256456-20171029223208

I'll explain a little bit. I feel that personal bias is often included in these votes, where they say they prefer one role list, all the judges did this, saying either they liked the any slot, or they liked the new rt slots or something like that. A debate should be judged based on the debate itself, not the issue being asked. the point of judging isnt to show their own opinion but rather say which side had the strongest argument. I agrer that team good rolelist shouldve won but not all the reasons. At the end, although convincing is important it doesn't mean everything, there's bound to be some personal bias.

to fix this you need

1. Judges that are neutral on the topic 2. More judges for more accurate judging 3. More participation in judging, so asking questions for confusing statements

all of the judges voted mainly because of their own opinion except you, so a light reminder would be nice to the next round of judges.

hope this helps!