Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-27575896-20180501201028

Currently, I saw Rubik's overall posts and I've had thoughts on ToTM for a long time about how people become nominated and what limits should be set. So far, the one vote/nomination only and the fact you can't withdraw votes to me has worked great. However, I've seen some other stuff based on little things, and I've seen people win without doing much at all, period. Or, they claim ''to do a lot of work, but looking back they rushed in the beginning or end to become eligible. ''

I would like to propose some new ideas regarding ToTM to make it more fair and give people who've won before some possible chances to really get in the nomination, considering we added the rewards based off of it for those who win twice. Anything accepted with apply AFTER THIS MONTH unless it is very minor/nobody is eligible (checking...)

I'll list a poll after:

- Create a limit regarding when someone can join ToTM based on account age or account edits. Starting proposal: Account Age: Must be at least two months old. Edit Count: Must be at least 1,500 total edits, or at least 100 mainspace edits.

- Lower the time between when a nominee who won ToTM can run again from three months to two.

- Remove the sceduled edit count to become eligible, and replace it and have a set-up where users judge if they are eligible based on what they have done for the wiki overall. (aka staff/users check the nominee and see if they are eligible based on their actions and contributations)

- Propose ideas for other possible rewards for winning ToTM other than a tag. (Becoming Staff not included, along with having everyone do something for you. Slavery is illegal.)

- becoming B-crat for the rest of ur life and destroying the wiki for lols cause ur a dictator inside

Poll: Select Your Choice (Optional) #1 #2 #3 #4 All Shown Options.  