Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-30255850-20171015211902/@comment-27804907-20171019211607

The problem with a final verdict is that it should be just that, final. Absolute. No discussion afterwards. However, this should be an open discussion. Stating your opinion is fine, but the creator should be given the chance to refute your points. As you've shown, the Hobo idea doesn't work because it's practically a Survivor. What if the creator believes it would make for a good Survivor rework? What are they supposed to do? You've already given your final verdict, which makes it seem like you're done. There's no more, it's canned. It's not a good tone to have. Maybe you and everyone else know why the role is bad, but the creator doesn't. So they should have the opportunity to defend their role - and then if it is a bad role, they'll get told why. They can learn not to make the same mistakes. The finality of everyone's posts makes it seem like that's the wrong thing to do.