Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171101070508/@comment-32881402-20171103205505

Addfire wrote: Jallybwan wrote: 1. Addfire, we base these debates off of Ranked. You'd expect everyone playing to be at least halfway-intelligent in some form. Especially in high-ELO games.

2. You've twisted his words. He said not to out NK early. Your example is literally STATED to be endgame. Of course you want to out the NK at the end of the game! 1. No, you don't. We're not assuming anything, except that the players are average Uh, let me think about that, no. Reasons in the post above.. When anyone says anything along the lines of, "Well, you could do that, but it isn't smart to ___" then you discard that argument. Smarts aren't the issue here. The issue here is capability. '''How so? Capability? What? '''

2. So... one of my examples explicitally said endgame. The others had nothing to do with timeframe. And the fact that you agree with me during the endgame helps prove my point: For NKs to survive, they need to go undetected, otherwise they get, to quote you, "phucked with a 6-inch cactus". The change makes it even easier to reveal/find the NK. It nerfs the NK. You cannot possibly disagree with that. '''Sure, but by such a tiny margin. It assures them that they died to, say, SK. Well, newsflash, SK is extremely confirmable! Point is that this nerf is so insignificant.'''

And I'd still like you to argue that a Night Immune killer who also has immunity to bodygaurd, sheriff, AND lookout needs this buff.