Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-27575896-20171101150106/@comment-32881402-20171108190253

SpicyJusticeLass wrote: ...Arceus, why are you even bothering? You're arguing at nothing here. I get it, it's about being productive and work ethic shit, but you think it's really necessary to go full out ToTM doesn't give a shit about if you're nice or not? It really does.

After all, this isn't something about User of The Month. It's Townie of The Month, something that everyone thinks you deserve of.

Five cents now? Maybe a franc? And that's where the change should be. A godly person who was a prick came and fixed the community in many ways, but was very prideful and shameless, he deserves it more than the person who answered 30 questions being really nice about it.

You might argue that this warrants a change in personality if they cared about it, and they really might change. But it does not stop those people who farm 30 half-assed edits that only just count and are really nice from being ToTM. Oh, look - they're eligible and they told me to keep questioning the game when I asked how many Mafia there were in the ranked rolelist! Wow, they really deserve it more than the guy who patronized me when reviewing a role idea, but actually made really great points that told me why the role wouldn't work and he has done this many many times. What an AWFUL person for telling me that my role was bad because of real reason; what a NICE person for telling me that questions are good!

I'm not saying that's the case, but it's certainly a problem imo. The more neutral judges (i.e. Staff) should decide who has been really helpful with clearing problems and reviewing role ideas. Personality really shouldn't play a part, as long as they're efficient and give real quality content to this Wiki.