Board Thread:Funsies and Randomies/@comment-39067078-20191124233522/@comment-35356104-20191125070221

Woooww... Evil faction with concept of healing-killing? Something really fresh and sounds very interesting, like how can da 2 total opposite components matched together? :) Looking forward to seeing it. Quack caught my attention though. Is that Quaccanthrope inspiration?

Btw, I think role reviewers are doing well recently. Speaking of attitude, they're properly exchanging information, being polite, honest and open-minded. They did give quality reviews too, points made are precise. Perhaps lack of insight? Not to say none at all but it takes time to reach the level of RDN. Hopefully they learn from experience and consistent effort of reviewing. For me, I see people taking inspiration of RDN's verdict a good thing though. It proves that people are learning from the good and leaving the bad like the "Rejected" thing. It's hard to just recreate something out of nothing, they must firstly grasp the tips of writing "verdict", then format it which fit to their style. It's a learning process, like a child learns to speak by listening to their parents and imitating it. And I think being the example is kind of a good thing to happen. Nobody ever imitates my review, and I even write a guideline for role reviewing. I casted doubt to myself if I had been doing things wrongly. If somebody copy my style in reviewing, I will be like "that person must have recognized me to do that". Me, earning almost recognition these days, feeling unmotivated. I wish I could set up a good example for the community and lead us better. I wouldn't mind people copying my reviewing format because I have been influencing them, and if I improve myself, people are doing it too. But sadly, I'm not. Instead of stopping people from copying RDN's verdict, I think enlighten them or even educate them for the proper way of doing it. That's we improve together.