Thread:Pokechurin/@comment-28112409-20171029192326/@comment-28112409-20171030031227

I'll admit, Desert's vote did seem opinionated regarding the Any slot aspect of the Ranked rolelist on DoTW 3 but the rest of his reasoning was fine to me, Zed's judgment wasn't bad, he did justify that the other team had poor reasoning and lingered on one point. I also noticed this, and will keep this in mind for the future.

As for your suggestions:

1- I'm already trying my best in that. I can't guarantee you 100% neutral judges every time.

2- This just makes the process of doing 1 very tedious. More judges means having to find more neutral judges. If anything, more judges could also mean less accurate judging because there's a higher chance of getting opinion-biased judges. If you think I'm not doing 1 right, then there's no way I can do 2 without complications and worse results.

3-That I can encourage and do. There's a risk of judges sometimes coming in to clarify something which gives one side an unfair advantage but I guess this isn't such a big issue, I'll work on it.

4- I definitely support this. Opinions do make debaters feel like there's bias, but that can easily be solved if 1 is done right, which again, I'm trying my best in.

I will consider your suggestions, so no worries, it does help.

Thanks for the feedback.