Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-27552918-20170412143635/@comment-32487879-20170414161000

TheDragonMaster825 wrote: To address the point about why i chose neutral (benign).

First off, neutral evil roles that kill arent generally accepted by the community and this role wins with town, which goes against the neutral evil rule that it has to give town a disadvantage. Its not Neutral (Killing) role because apart from the part that it would be buffed sk, the killing part was the twist. That was to nerf the idea that it wins with town.
 * Well then no.

Neutral (Chaos) would be a good alignment for this since the any role would make this role unlikely to show up and this would seem like a chaotic role. 'BMG doesnt like neutral (chaos) roles' Neutral Benign (Neutral Survival sounds better) was the alignment that i picked since nb roles such as amnesiac have to win with certain factions anyway. Neutral Benign doesn't mean it wins with certain factions. It means it picks a side, and tries to win that way. Amnesiac? Same deal. Survivor? Same deal.
 * This would actually make sense, you know.

This is literally, as I call it, Neutral wannabe-town-but-can't alignment. And no, that's not a suggestion. That's a critical comment.

And look, I haven't even CONSIDERED the mechanics; purely from the alignment? Bad, bad, and bad all together. Besides, why have something that "helps" the town that actually does more harm than good?