Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-34855529-20180417010508/@comment-34797858-20180417022235

SpacedefenderX wrote: MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

SpacedefenderX wrote: MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

SpacedefenderX wrote: FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority. But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right. Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics. I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics. Yet it doesn’t add up

@FFF1105 how many people were in those games What do you mean?