Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-32881402-20180129202907/@comment-34551912-20180202021847

But that's what's fixed when people prefer to play a good game rather than a bad one. You are literally saying, no reason to fix the game. Any step in the right direction is a step in the right direction if you get what I mean. The more swing we take out, the better the game gets. Monopoly is not balanced, chess is 100% balanced. Which one has a better ranked system? Chess of course! People don't like playing ranked when they don't win for being good. Why not just roll a dice at the beginning of the game and determine who wins? If we are going to leave everything to chance, really you are just prolonging dice rolls rather than playing a game. You are right when you say that swing still exists, but there is no problem with limiting this. I am a Moderator for TG, where we create and test roles, and I can conclude from the mock trial games that we have held that Town (Power) is extremely painful, and from my experience being there I can conclude that everything can be fixed with some time and effort, your lack of effort is why there will be no change. Is a 50% better than a 25% on a test? They are both failing, sure, but 50% is without a doubt better. The same rule applies to Town of Salem.