Board Thread:Role Ideas (Rework)/@comment-208.108.212.74-20170328131231/@comment-31402008-20170329184655

The reasons why the Vampire Hunter shouldn't be a Neutral role...

-Like Vertroyer said: it doesn't make that sense for a neutral to be the predator/worst enemy of another neutral.

-The Vampire Hunter IS THERE to protect THE TOWN from Vampires. Please imagine THE TOWN, without a Vampire Hunter. There are like... what? 8 townies in Normal. Vampires aren't night immune. So 8 townies, 3 townies become vampires along with the first vampire they make up the Vampire faction. So many murders and lynches would take place. And for every vampire that will die, they will turn other people to vampires. LEMME SAY THIS. The Godfather is the only mafia role with bite immunity. All others will die if they are bitten by a vampire. And if the Vampires kill a mafia member, they won't have to wait for another night to bite somebody, they will be able to bite the next night. Imagine the process of townies dying by NKs and Mafia. They lynch each other. Vampires do their work voting up NKs, killing mafia, turning townies into Vampires. Essentially they will win like in every single vamp game. PLUS why would you have the Vampire Hunter as a neutral role? He wins with everybody? Like a survivor clone? Please no. He can't be a single role in a faction. He doesn't fit in any Neutral alignment.

-In a lot of the games I have played, people kill VH claims. NKs and Mafia kill VH claims.

IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IF SOMEBODY SAID SOMETHING, IT MAKES IT TRUE.