Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171025060017/@comment-31680260-20171027222904

Charliep2 wrote:

ProfessorArceus wrote: How did you get that I was trying to agree with it? I called it irrelevant.

you did say irrelevant, but you then stated that us aren't new players which would be agreeing with the other person (No, it isn't. Go look up the definition of "agree". Arceus very much does NOT agree with you.) 

Usually, usually, usually. Please stop using this as an argument - we've established that 'potential', 'usually' and 'I always' generally don't make good arguments. but it's obvious that it would happen, phuk it, if we can't use usally then bodyguard doesn't usually get to protect same as doctor so they are both useless... (Correction: Neither of them are useless. Your problem with using potential is that you were using the word to try and work in something that would NEVER happen in a typical game of ToS. Neither BG nor Doc are useless, or else this debate wouldn't be here in the first place. It just so happens that BG is more useful, speaking generally.) 

His initial argument was irrelevant - but why not argue against it anyway?

ok

'chance' = potential

ok

Skill, we know, doesn't play a part in this. A role can be easy and overpowered. A role can be hard and not underpowered because of its skill requirement. whats "A" role (Any role. This "rebuttal" is also irrelevant. 

Look at Vert's post again and rethink your statement involving Coven.

that's just patronizing...

'Probably' - give me numbers or the argument is null.

ProfessorArceus wrote:

'chance' = potential

'''umm you didn't give numbers there.... so (He doesn't need to when he's literally COMPARING WORDS.) '''