Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-27575896-20180501201028/@comment-32329805-20180517023111

WolfiZee wrote: ProfessorArceus wrote: If there was no eligibility requirement, someone who puts no effort into the wiki can easily win. '''I disagree with that. The wiki isn't made of idiots. We tend to choose people who put effort into the wiki by default. Honestly it's not a huge deal but for the sake of this debate (which is focused on this), it is. Why should we warp reality for a debate? Nonsense.''' Eligibility only ensures that users are working relatively hard for the wiki so they deserve the reward. '''​​​​​​Does it really matter, though? As i said, we tend to choose people who put EFFORT into the wiki by default.''' It's either ToTM becomes extremely casual and is barely a reward, or people have to put effort. I' prefer the casual part. I'd prefer the latter, because that's how everything should be. Put in effort and get a result. I intensely practise my musical instrument every day and I get good at it. I excersise hard every few days and I get fit. I strictly keep to a diet, I lose weight. Effort should mean reward. Not idly sitting around commenting one nice comment every other day then going offline. " I disagree with that. The wiki isn't made of idiots. We tend to choose people who put effort into the wiki by default."It all comes down to the community's lack of responsibility to ToTM. ? The Staff should not force work on us and even if they did, I'm sure we wouldn't accept it properly I agree 100% - some of us, I guarantee, will vote blindly. Some isn't a Majority or Plurality. Fair enough - I have no duty to thoroughly look into edits. I don't either, i completely agree with you on that aspect. Also could we please start seperating our arguments into seperate paragraphs? Thanks. This is where we last were.