Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26234016-20170906203547/@comment-25876622-20170914185542

These should be part of good feedback: Correct me if I'm wrong, but it may be that our role reviewing community focuses mostly on (1), sometimes (2), and rarely (3) or (4). This inspires only few role authors to improve their role to gain our reviewers' recognition. Most authors probably leave the thread with a negative feeling.
 * 1) Point out flaws and rehashing occurrences.
 * 2) Point out positive and/or creative aspects of a role.
 * 3) Suggest mechanical changes to the role which would counteract flaws or rehashing occurrences.
 * 4) Simulate the effect of this role in different situations to analyze its effect on gameplay.