Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-36558623-20180922232736/@comment-32651233-20181017003808

Faraday242 wrote: Orecreeper wrote: Faraday242 wrote:

Orecreeper wrote: Faraday242 wrote: Followers don't know who the Preacher is. Well that doesn't change the fact that they can just all revert. true, but if town is close to winning this seals mafia on voting. If Town is close to winning, this role is completely useless and is just an extra vote. if town is close to winning, this role is slowing things down.

If Mafia is close to winning, this role is still useless since no one wants to win as a Follower, they want to win as a real role.

'''if Mafia is close to winning, this role becomes a kingpin and people will be begging to become a Follower. no one cares about winning as a 'real role'. '''

If Mafia has majority, this role doesn't even have to do a thing.

that's true, but it helps mafia get there.

(Btw sry about being harsh, I just feel a bit like that about conversion roles sometimes. Its still a great role, better than most of the roles Ive made, but I'm just pointing out stuff).

you've made plenty of good roles, and you have the unique trait of each of your roles bringing something new to the table, that no one has every thought of.

thanks, I'm glad you like them :)

it's fine to be harsh, as long as you and I know you are helping and not bashing, and you're not.

thanks for the feedback ;P I'm glad you are taking my feedback as feedback and not as attacking the role :p thanks bro, seriously.

Now, I understand the point of this role, but the reverting thing kinda bugs me because it usually just kills the point of the role. It's like giving someone the option of whether they want to be bitten by a vampire or not. If you force people to become Followers, it might be better, but now it just sounds somewhat like a Vampire re-hash. If there is a way we can make this role have a unique separation from vampire, but still be reliable as in, it is not completely dependent on others.