Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-35890342-20181201161311/@comment-25615841-20181230152721

Pokechurin wrote: RubikJohn wrote: Yes, that's gone, to let the lazy staff do less work not restrict the candidates. However, in my personal opinion, it just seems to promote laziness among nominees and has increased the amount of self nomination. Hey, I guess that could be unrelated though.

And can we stop attacking Doge - I was asking a question, it kind of looks to have devolved into harassment o.0 We should have a bar but it shouldn't be based off of pure edits because that's as we all know a flawed system. Idk how to fix it exactly...maybe a candidate should have a portfolio where they show examples of how they help users and mainspace edits and whatever. Something like that would be nice. That kind of thing is something I think voters should be in charge off. It should be us to spot who's trying hard enough to go the extra mile instead of hyping up their self nomination and then just leaving it.

If anything, for an edit count, I'd be leaning towards either a choice between different types of useful edits or just anything that doesn't restrict users.