Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-33561820-20171104105018/@comment-32881402-20171104171750

Sorry, gotta laugh at this reviewing technique. If you're going to reject a role, do it properly. You've just listed some things that are bad without explaining why. Nice one. Alignment misplacement is very easy to fix. Unstoppable attacks exist for a reason, it's unfair to deduct points for that. In fact it's just stupid to deduct points for that. It's an attack value and you've not stated why it's a problem. Try and understand the post again, why would he deliver a parcel to himself? Let's use your own technique here:

Alignment misplacement is an extremely easy fix -10

RNG can be good, for example rolelist swing -10

Unstoppable attack value is an attack value for a reason. You can't deduct points for using it -10

You can't take implications -10

Total score 60

Passing score 90

Look, my point is that there is no pass mark for roles. It's stupid to have one, as sometimes it can be fixed very easily. I suppose you could make one, but it wouldn't be very efficient as the mark scheme will not cover every single possible combination or idea. Then you'd have to measure to what degree it breaks your 'rules'. Then you have to actually calculate merit in the role, because it isn't all bad. Unless you're going to make a proper mark scheme, never do this again, please.