Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-25646419-20180911115856/@comment-25615841-20180917175312

RubikJohn wrote:

2 Votes: Even if it isn't necessary, there's no reason not to implement it. For one, it gives voters more freedom, and makes it a lot more likely for them to spend at least one vote on who they seriously believe deserves to win. Even if everyone is perfectly aware of the rules, with one vote, you can't always expect everyone involved to vote fairly, and two votes make that a lot easier. From personal experience, to me at least it seems that votes were distributed more proportionately to cold hard numbers, like useful edits or activity. And again, is there really a reason not to have two votes? i ask once again;

is there a reason NOT to have two votes?