Board Thread:Off-Topic Posts/@comment-39067078-20190814024731

I was thinking... Why is RDN considered one of the best at reviewing? It's similar to Michelin stars.

RDN is consistent and able to project a clear message.

So, I take a spin at it.

Here's my unneccessary cooking format

The Exquisite Flavors (The Good parts of your role):

This is where I talk about how good your role is and what I love about your role. If there is nothing, you failed.

The Conflicting Flavors (The Parts that must be changed):

This is the part where I talk about the parts that mangle with other mechanics and how it needs to be changed.

The Wretched Flavors (The Flavors which must be gotten rid of):

This is the part with things that don't work at all.

The Hint of Flavor (A mechanic that could be worked upon):

This is a thing that RDN does not talk about, but it's the mechanics that could potentially be cool.

Hmmm… 

Your results:

Creativity: / (How your role cleverly incorporates mechanics)

Originality: / How your role has unique mechanics)

Mechanics: / (How your role is balanced)

Duality: / (How your role is versatile)

Fun: / (How fun your role is to play)

Depending on these 5 factors, you may get:

3/3 Michelin Stars (I loved your role. It was creative and is genuinely a pelasure to see.

2/3 Michelin Stars (Your role was interesting but had flaws.)

1/3 Michelin Stars (Your role had many problems.)

0/3 Michelin Stars (Your role seems fine but is insanely broken.)

 