Thread:Ulithemuli/@comment-30105631-20170110022354/@comment-25876622-20170111103041

FirePyre wrote: The wiki (And Naru) decided we needed at least 3 moderators I was never aware of this decision, neither do I see any supporting arguments anywhere. Is three a magic number? Naru himself answered you that we don't currently need more moderators. I gave a reason in point 1 why I currently don't see the benefit of having additional moderators. I and others have done that job just as well. The majority of roles these days don't even get reviewed by Vert. He's very busy with life, but that's taking a toll on his reputation on the wiki. It was just the original reason of his promotion: Consistently contributing considerable critique, backed by BMG forum background. I'm in the eastern Australian time zone, and most of our moderators are in the American and/or western Australian time zone, so there are hours where I'm on and no other moderators are on. Isn't Hawaiian living in Australia as well? it can't hurt to have another discussion moderator It can! role reviewing spree I went on yesterday No cherry picking! seeking out pages that need an editor to fix up grammatical and spelling mistakes, and volunteering to edit it Alright, let's go with this! If you are willing to edit threads for readability, it would definitely be appreciated by many. I don't personally mind, since threads aren't wiki pages. Congratulations!