Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171002232846/@comment-28112409-20171020052426

HereThereEverywhere wrote: That pulls into question the fixed number of three judges, then. If number doesn't matter, why must there be three? Why could there not be more judges, for there are most likely more people who can judge well. Because then it gets more tedious for me to maintain, and more chaotic with people switching it and out.