Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27575896-20170927192006/@comment-31256456-20170928043310

ZedKiller13 wrote: This is a slate and not going to instanty be added in. OK FAIR ENOUGH

'''You get one vote only. '''The vote is re-funded if the user you voted on is currently not eligible. This would lower the hassle to count the votes and have people focus on who they actually think should win.

'Very good. That is a fair system'

You can nominate one person, but it does NOT count as a vote. This would balance the fact if a nomination counted as a vote, they can't do anything else in ToTM. You can vote for the person you nominated, or you can nominate someone and vote for someone else if you feel such.

'Mixed but I think so. '

'''You must require either 30 mainspace edits, 30 helpful role idea reviews, 30 good responses to questions on the Ask Questions board, or a mix of the three. '''Because it is from the current month and the month prior, it would give users a more feeling to help out around the wiki.

Because I don't know the game THAT well, that's a definite yes for me because I rarely edit- not saying I WANT to be nominated, i don't want it,  but other people might find that interesting, offering ways for people who don't like editing to get involved

'''You must have at least have made an edit or post for the last two months. '''This shows that the user is active and helps out around the wiki or just stays active.

'Of course. '

'''You must not have a history of previous bans or vandal edits on the wiki. '''Users found to have either of these are prevented from entering ToTM or voting. If it is a minor ban and the user has no morw after that, they can be allowed into ToTM, such as a 1 day-1 week ban

'I like the idea of being able to redeem yourself despite being banned- if the person isn't trustworthy we shouldn't nominate him anyway or vote... so mixed. '



To agree, type either a /support, /agree, or anything related.

/support