Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-35420390-20180819154002/@comment-35420390-20180825153511

ThEXP0001 wrote: BendBones wrote: So you think this role will have a hard time winning games? No, I'm just saying it will help win more, which they do need. The way you had him set out was too much like a. (Because they can only win with themselves and other )

This also makes him slightly like a for. (As most times will work with  for numbers) This isn't to say it would be impossible to win solo, but this gives it a team that might accidently kill it, moving it into line with other. I agree on this to a degree but I also feel like this role is on its way to be a, and if you have 2 different working together, you will ahve a hard time stopping them both.

BendBones wrote: ... this role is kinda OP if it don't have a revealing result like the have

You bring up a good point here, but then you also have to consider the other possibilities. They could be framed, meaning the result could be wrong. They could also be, meaning you don't want to lynch them. So even though it outs them, they do have a low wall they can hide behind. This is only if the result is changed to ",, , " and that is a really bad result for this role, in my mind.

The only role without that wall is, which I feeel is unfair to him. '''Thats why I kinda wanted to give him a result, that could be worked on later, but I also feel like hes strong if he can just smash though protections and have a wall to hide behind.

This is just the opinion of some guy on the internet, so you have no reason to listen to me. '''Well, so far you're the only "guy on the internett" who ahve reviewed the role idea.