Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28112409-20190123101502/@comment-25615841-20190124170905

Pretty spot on. There isn't really a way to reply passively without sounding like a lazy asshole who has no plan to actually make a difference when that's what the whole thread is about, but here's my main question:

Do you think every reviewer has a game knowledge and typing ability to convey their responses to role ideas in a fashion that transcends as many plains of reality as yours? New users on the boards can always be pushed towards giving whatever advice they can in a productive way as well as be directed to a revamped page to guide them, but even with those guidelines, how do you know reviewers will understand, and thus form their reviews in a way you'd be satisfied with? Do you think the Making New Roles page - that should probably include some advice on how to reply to role ideas as well, seeing how much of a hot discussion topic this seems to be - will actually be enough to get new reviewers to nail their structure, positivity, and most importantly the actual content of their review being accurate, well-informed and cover the role in practice, much like Uli's reviews? And if not, to what level can the average reviewer actually be brought up to just by reading one guide, especially if they don't have much experience on the role idea boards?