Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32994909-20180620175521/@comment-35026689-20180621172204

I can confirm that if A was jailed, then you can't see them visit as they did not visit the Jailor. the Lookout should not have seen the Sk visit, as they were jailed. B is not lookout at all.

A is definately the Serial killer no doubt, as they were jailed and claimed doctor, and jailor died to SK. the Sheriff confirmed that as well

Moar theorys 1

Jailor

Vigilante

Werewolf

Ambusher

Medium

Sheriff

Investigator

Retributionist

Serial Killer

Mafioso

Consort

Necromancer

Forger

Potion Master

Day 3

Player X was jailed and executed. He was a member of the Mafia. He is Consigliere

Someone was shot by a Vigilante. Consort

Someone was mauled by a Werewolf. Mafioso

Someone was killed by a member of the Mafia. Medium

Someone was killed by an Ambusher. Sheriff Ambusher is now Mafioso

They cannot seance until they found a town role The medium waits for more info then to seance jailor n6

Day 4

Someone was shot by a Vigilante. Potion boi

The Jailor was killed by a member of the Mafia.

His will stated that he jailed Player B on the first night, and executed Player X on the second night, and on the third night the player he jailed claimed Mayor.

The Player who was jailed was Player Y.

Town asked Player Y to reveal himself, but he did not. Town did not lynch anyone that day.

Y is claiming ret but was baiting town protective on them until they could revive the jailor. they are actual ret

Also WW was executed

Day 5

The Jailor was resurrected.

Both Player Y and Player Z whispered to him claiming that they revived him.

The actual Investigator said he investigated Player Z, who came up as Medium, Janitor, Retributionist, Necromancer or Trapper.

Z is taking advantage of the fact that Y is baiting in the TP on them as the PM found out their true role, so claims ret based on the fact that Y is the ret. Y's tactic is to use the TP on them to protect them, whilst warding off evils to let them revive. However, Z has the same investigation results and tried to claim ret

Day 6

Player Y was jailed and executed. he is Retributionist. Z's play made Y's play backfire as the jailor executed the ret

Night 6

The Jailor received a seance from a Medium, who told him that a Sheriff died interrogating a Serial Killer, who was Player A. The Jailor realised that Player A was currently jailed, and he agreed that Player A is definitely Serial Killer because of his suspicious Doctor claim.

A is SK but jailor has no excecutions

Day 7

The Jailor was stabbed by a Serial Killer. Cannot execute

He had announced that he'd been seanced in his last will.

Player B claimed Lookout, and said he was watching the Jailor, and only saw Player A visit him and the Medium, via the seance, visit him.

B cannot have seen Player visit the Jaior, as being jail does not make you visit them. Lookout cannot see the Sk visit when they are in Jail, so they are fake. They are the Forger trying to claim Lookout by using the visit to 'confirm' themselves. They know who the SK is as the consig found n2 but decided to hide the info before using it to their advantage. However, SK cannot visit in Jail so B cannot be true. he is forger

The actual Investigator said that Player B is Lookout, Forger or Coven Leader.

Give all the arguments for Player B being a real Lookout.

He did claim that A visited the Jailor and killed them, and they did see the Medium visit the Jailor. This information is true from a distance

Give all the arguments for Player B being another role.

B cannot actually have seen a jailed target visit the Jailor, as B should have only seen the Medium ,assume the Jailor keeps a reasonable will and said that they jailed A, it shoud be obvious that A killed the Jailor. B takes the correct answer with the wrong reasons, A did not visit the Jailor

Y is the Retributionist, who claimed mayor for the sake of surviving in All Any to bring back the Jailor. By baiting the TP on them, the Killers cannot have killed Y whilst Jailor was being revived.

Z however backfired that claim by claiming ret, wholly knowing that Y was the actual ret due to the PM finding out, and using it to their advantage. The Risky Paly by Y went wrong when Z cced ret, and the results are the same for Z so the Jailro lost the exe cutions.

A is wholly the serial Killer because of the sus doc claim, the sheriff saying so, the jailro dying to sk as such. this does not need explaining more.

X is the Consig who found the SK N1/2 and told B the forger about it, resulting in B making a fake lookout will that stated that A visited the Jailor and Killed them. However, this is not the case as SK cannot visitin Jailor whilst in Jail.

Justify your arguments fully, giving the roles of all mentioned Players in your answers.

Assume that…

> The Jailor never revealed himself, or said anything that would make people think he’s the Jailor, day or night.

> Nobody gamethrew.

> No whispers occurred throughout the game except the ones stated above.

This seems to make sense

IS THIS THE HARDEST RIDDLE YET OR IS THE OTHER ONE HARDER