Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171202105652/@comment-28112409-20171202181832

Anons unite wrote: yup. your judging was pretty good if it wasnt for the constant flow of insults coming towards us. its just for fun. in your post, its kind of unclear why you quit though- is it a combination of not wanting to host and real life events or what?

good idea, kind of poor execution. it's why I didnt debate that often- my debate style wouldnt fit well with your insul- i mean criticism, so i just didnt want to make the judge angry.

and if i recall, didnt  you called out duckgamer for not doing as well in the last debate? it still did better than half of us there, but just because he "nuked" the last debate, doesnt mean you can call him out because he wasnt spot on this time? thats just an example.

so goodbye vert, and good luck with real life. hopefully you can still be at least on this wiki. You do know I always insult, right? It's like, my normal habit, and it's usually for comedic effect. So I don't see where you're trying to go with that point. I think I've made it very clear why I'm quitting, I can't host debates right anymore.

My criticism was only once done, only bloody once, and it was out of how stale the debate was. I've been bombarded by people wanting to raise the standards of debating, and I was trying to appeal to as much people as possible by helping people improve. If you did see my criticism as insults, then you're too soft-skinned.

The duckgamer comment was just a side note, I wasn't trying to go anywhere with that. Otherwise, I may as well have went and criticized the living shit out of him, making about 3 or 4 paragraphs just for duckgamer. It was just an interesting difference I noticed and I wanted to bring it up, even though I did fuck the context up.

And yes, I'm still gonna be on the wiki =P