Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171002232846/@comment-28112409-20171021230333

HereThereEverywhere wrote: Vertroyer wrote: Because then it gets more tedious for me to maintain, and more chaotic with people switching in and out. Well I don't quite see how making a few more people who are in good standing judges if they please would require much if any maintenance, nor do I see it being very chaotic as long as they stay for the entire duration of a debate. If you don't want more, that's fine, but I still don't see any major reason for it. I'm not always guaranteed judges. Just so you know, people do switch between wanting to be judges and debating, and they do constantly. If I raise the limit, and say in one of those debates, most of the judges or those who requested to be judges went debating. I could end up in a situation where I'd be having an even number of judges and a possiblity of a tie, I could have more and more people just annoyingly spamming me to be judge, if I even have a spot.

I've gone with the 3 judge format for the past two debates, and it's been working just fine. I find no necessity for more than 3 judges.