Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-31680260-20170505214612/@comment-31680260-20170505223035

HAWAIIANpikachu wrote: It's the "Chaos role = rejected" that annoys me. There's literally no point to it as far as I'm aware of, and you said it yourself - the only person it makes sense to is the person who made that rule.

​I just go by it because, hey, what if they have a good reason to?

Also, correct me if I'm wrong but that's a rule from the "Making NEW Roles" page. Transporter isn't a new role, and the rules are intended to make things balanced. Trans is balanced (in my opinion anyway).

​If your changing a role, you still have to follow those rules, as you are still making a role new by changing it.

Although, going by what you said, it COULD fit in NE. In your "benign" section, you said it does a lot of harm to everyone. "Everyone", in this case, is likely to be a townie (at least 8 in 15 people are Town). NE is supposed to harm townies.

​Yes, tho you may need to make it have a minor other goal as well.

Bold statement 1: If they have a good reason to reject Chaos roles, why isn't it stated on the page? Or do they just not like Vamps? (Not judging anyone, just curious)

Bold statement 2: Good point there. But if those rules don't have a good reason to exist (that I can see) then I tend to ignore them :3   -Seriously though, no point in having a restriction with no purpose.

Bold statement 3: Maybe "make someone target themself". That would be interesting, you'd have to try and predict who would go for who. Any other ideas?

I really love how the people on this wiki are willing to discuss things in-depth. Thanks for taking the time to do so :D