Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-31919347-20171004155435/@comment-25646419-20171011043444

I get the idea of it and it may sound good on paper but... I feel like this might run well for a little bit and then crash.

People have complained numerous times in the past about "edit racking". There was also concern that ToTM is more of a popularity contest than acknowledging who has contributed the most. I feel like this setup may make things too complicated.

I'm throwing in the idea to simplify things. Forget about the number of edits a person has made. Leave it up to the person nominated to explain why they should win and have them provide examples of edits. Not just "Oh I'm active on Discord and I have answered some questions!". If you want to win, put in the effort by linking to your edits to say "This is what I've contributed." ... That basically leaves it up to the community to decide instead of the mods if a person's edits are actually quality, or if the person is just pulling things out of their butt.