Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-29253708-20171113010002/@comment-32881402-20171117204318

Anons unite wrote: ProfessorArceus wrote: @everyone who gave a half-assed review, or accepted it: USE DESERT'S 'ISSUES' SECTION TO MAKE YOUR POST HALF-DECENT OR TO IMPROVE IT. I have nothing against you if you accept it, but at least comment on the issues that he suggested! He's feeding you questions and you're not answering. Raven, that's what I call "not a review". A review can be negative or positive - but it has some content aside from what Desert told you NOT TO DO. You can say it's fine as it is, but argue for the role when it DOES HAVE CRITICISM from other people. Or at the very, very least, comment on what Desert has asked for a comment on. Otherwise you're not actuaally reviewing. You're making your post seem substantial because of this huge quote.

Raven, here's the actual review:

"This is the one I dicredit you on this one"

"It has silmar attributes to Plaguebearer"

"Interesting, so your attack is delay"

"Accepted  (I just think it would be better to have correct Investagor Result though)" 

' No, that is not enough substance to make a review. The only thing you've done is point out the obvious and you can't muster up an actual sentence for your review. How many times do I have to tell you this isn't how to review? You're just repetitive and you're making this thread longer with this huge quote unnecessarily. ' nothing says you CANT give half assed reviews. it's just frowned upon and probably won't count as a useful edit. cut dad some slack It gives a false idea of you actually helping. It makes you seem better than you actually are. In fact, your review was a waste of space, but people see the huge quote and are pleased. Newcomers might see those reviews and do similar things.