Board Thread:Role Ideas (Rework)/@comment-35785028-20180607044032/@comment-35356104-20180608031340

So it's like adding variation to Exe strategy? Errr... Not really that necessary, but ok? I guess it's fine to give Exe another aggresive tactic besides classic Sheriff claim and da passive CC strategy. But you gotta know this isn't going to do a lot. Roles that stumble Exe are those with high confirmability. No accusation can rebut the nature of their ability. Accusation can only work before they act.

Move back to your scenario, how are you going to hang a confirmed Vet even though you know their role? The only way to have a slight chance to lynch the Vet is by accusing them to be Mafioso by the claim of Inves before the Vet act. Ideally on D2, otherwise I don't think a fake Inves last will is that easy to be pull off. But how powerful an Inves accusation on D2 can be when a massive chunk of ambiguity exists? U know people are shilly-shallying about matter of lynching a high-confirmability role.

I don't say this wouldn't work, but it's a minimal effort to eliminate the scenes where Exe can be screw. BTW, theories are made based on abstract simulation which differs depending on one's experience. I think it's more convincing to let the forum balancers measure the gap between theories and praxis.