Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-31680260-20180202080353/@comment-31864614-20180228223107

ZedKiller13 wrote: Right now, there is some discussion on eligibility and who counts towards it.

Remember, for those who are monitoring eligibility credits, here is how it works:

EVERY mainspace edit is worth one credit towards the 30 needed.

Every ROLE IDEA credit is based on the THREAD and the RESPONSE. You may post 5 times in one thread, but you only earn one. Your response can also NOT only be: "its way too overpowered debuff it and maybe ill reconsider" or anything like that without valid reasoning or a real review. If you are FOLLOWING along with someone ELSE'S post, it counts if it's a good, detailed review. Otherwise, the first poster wins all.

QUESTIONS answered are each worth one credit. You answer a question, you get it. First come first serve. If ANOTHER question from the original ASKER is answered again, whoever answers is so the asker fully understands it gets a credit.

DOTW (Debate of the Week) HIGHLY DETAILED DEBATES ONLY COUNT. Each one that exceeds a limit of 125 words that pulls some deep points are counted, as otherwise spamming posts and putting a bunch of repeated sentences isn't eligible either. Exceptions if it totally shuts down the other side, but we'll see into that.

Idea: I have an idea where a user of the wiki can't run if they haven't been there for at least two months, OR they make a MAJOR change to the wiki that is amazing. This would prevent some new users who seem helpful with a couple edits only from winning ToTM easily, while other possible better and older users who have a better effort to the wiki can't run due to the "popularity" contest.

mind some misspelled words if there are any, I type fast Sonow i cant run ooofoofofofoof