Thread:Orecreeper/@comment-32651233-20190126211828/@comment-32651233-20190127013924

Vertroyer wrote: By all means, tell us which points are far-stretched, stupid or untrue. You surely look like some divinely wise guy, go ahead. For starters, normal users aren't quote unquote "biased". Normal users do vote for people that they believe have been being nice and helpful around the wikia, and it is okay to vote for your friend if you believe that they were contributing. Not a single recent ToTM winner did not deserve ToTM in my eyes. If the normal users here are "biased", the staff would be biased too.

Second, the staff are not completely bias-free at all. To say that is to say that every single one of Trump's ideas and everything that he does is right (some of them are, but not all). Comparing normal users to staff is like comparing fucking Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump: both have their blindspots. Staff have biases too, whether you are willing to admit it or not, or for one, you might not even realize that you are biased.

Third, people can have their own opinions on who is being the most helpful. Just because you don't think someone is helpful on the wikia means they are not helpful? That logic is literally worthy of fucking INB4EDITS. Helpful is a subjective word, the biggest contributor is also a subjective title, you do not decide who is the biggest contributor or who has been the most helpful on the wikia because you are staff.