Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-30757827-20190820222718/@comment-25615841-20190821173933

This is honestly an awesome idea. It's about time to see some more intensity within role creating/reviewing. I can move this thread to General Discussions, if you want, seeing as Role Creation is a pretty major part of this community. I'd also suggest future threads to be kept there so they don't get buried.

yeah the criticism

Even though it's kind of too early to tell much, most of my concerns come from the way judging is held. For one, I don't think it's right to elevate any judge. If anything, this basically seperates 4 judges and having their opinions heard in the final tally. You're free to run this however you want, of course, but I'd like to at least suggest that you keep all judges on the same plane. Perhaps having each role submitted to all judge anonymously after a round of reviews that are open to the public would work? This would still iron out any inconsistencies within the roles, but would give all judges an equally important role.

Then again, all of the above may just be my vision of a completely different event, so feel free to ignore it.

A side note; the two-round system is great. Giving all roles a chance to improve is definitely a good idea, though I've addressed its execution above.

poke for the first guest judge btw