Board Thread:Role Ideas (Town)/@comment-26494712-20161127022327/@comment-29779988-20161127030653

Llamatopia wrote: Is allowing non killing roles to kill against BMG rules?. The Blacksmith has already been recommended or the "allowing killing roles to kill" was recommended? The role is by far not too complicated to plan out- I have to disagree there'''. There are more complicated roles, such as disguiser, who maybe not in terms of gameplay, but in game creation and programming. '''

'''First of all, yes. Allowing non-killing roles to kill is against the rules. That's why it's known as a 'supplier' role. Disguiser is complicated now, but as of recently, someone created new boundaries for disguiser so it isn't as confusing! The  main issue is allowing a non killing alignment to kill. That's like giving a gun to a neutral benign! '''

Also, I do not understand "(Do not create new existing results without creating an existing one!) "

'''Pardon me, that's just me ranting. What I mean is that for the future, you can create your own investigation results. Just make sure to add to an existing one as well. So like say that I have something paired with Jester and Witch. I should also have something with Vampire Hunter, Survivor, etc.'''

You say : "Your target is a molter of foreign town weapons. They must be a Blacksmith! Even though that's hardly any better. " This is a bit cheesey, have you read some of the other EXISTING role investigative results? Some are nowhere near "outside the box" and are just straight to the point. Sometimes it bothers me when people try to be too unique and end up making it really corny. "a molter of foreign town weapons" sounds a like something I'd read from a thesaurus addicted Wattpad writer to me.

That explains it all.

You tell me : "Some simple reasons of rejection... look up for understanding. " But then I look up and you tell me to look down " I'll explain once we get to the bottom"

Whoops XD Sorry bout that.

From your explanation at the bottom, I see why it was rejected, but I still have question (as stated above) as to why. It seems like most of these were just your '''exploding harsh opinions on me, rather than clarifying why they were bad. '''I'm glad you gave your opinion, though. I do not see why you are so frustrated. Your comments are quite blunt. Are you here to be a gentle critic or something else?

'''Hon, I'm anything but gentle in the real world. I've been much more cruel if that's what you're asking. If you do not like the way that I criticize you, then fine. I might as well not have said a thing. But because I have to respect all on the wiki (I had a firm talk about this -_-) I'll explain in a SIMPLE MANNER in A NUMBERED LIST.'''

(Also how am I beating my harsh opinions on you? I'm just being me. Guess I can be too harsh. Good to know that some of the old Momo is still in me. Also, it's 10:02 pm. Give me a break

Momo at night = Not nice Momo!

'''1. This is, once again, a 'Supplier' role. BMG has rejected this in all sorts of forms, no matter the alignment. The fact it gives out something to people is an issue. Another form of this is allowing someone to gain use to do something again, like a doctor being able to heal themselves again. '''

'''2. As I said before, this allows non-killing roles to kill. I don't like this, which is my opinion (be scared!) but it isn't just mine. It's BMG's as well. And if the developers don't like it, neither will ToS.'''

'''3. *This one is new* Town hardly needs another huge buff, ESPECIALLY like this one. It's already been given enough stuff. '''

'''4. Momo is no longer being friendly. I do not like your attitude with how you treat me (I hope you know I'm kidding.)'''

5. '''LAST AND FINAL REASON! Well, not for rejection. This was set up in a formal manner so I decided to take a different approach.''' Annnnnnnnnnnnnd I'm out *CLOSE BOOKS*