Board Thread:Role Ideas (Neutral)/@comment-29669939-20161026105829/@comment-29779988-20161026235541

ChickenPieNuggetz wrote: It might be OP/UP but anyway.

Hangman (Neutral Evil)

Summary: A corrupt judge, eager for people to die.

Sort of like Justice Wargrave from Agatha Christe's And Then There Were None.

Abilites: Suddenly create an anonymous court in the middle of the day. (Max 1)

'''What...? There already is a trial in the middle of the day, so this won't work.'''

Attributes: When in court, everyone will be named as "Jury", while you'll be called "Judge". You gain extra votes when in the court, and anyone that is voted up to the stand is immediately executed (Minimum 1, Max 3). You can also hear whispers.

'''This is creating a completely different game trial, which is honestly a way of breaking the game. I see no reason to even have this. Not only that, but it's complecated. '''

Goal: See Town Lose.

Results:

Sheriff Results: Your target is ambitious for people to be executed. He must be the Hangman!

This would've been an investigator's result instead.

Investigator Results: Your target is waiting for the perfect moment to strike. He could be a Sheriff/Exe/WW or Hangman.

Consigliere: Your target is a corrupt judge. He must be the Hangman!

Stuff:

Mechanics: When the Hangman calls court, everyone becomes the default skin, while the Hangman becomes a different skin. Everyone will change places, and whispering won't be allowed (So people don't know who's who). The judge must tap on himself (at night) for this to happen in the next day. If the judge dies on the night he was going to call court, the call is cancelled. The Hangman will gain extra votes, and there will be a minimum of 1 person lynched.

Like an NE, this role can create trouble for both the Town, the Mafia and the NKs. The reason I like this role, is because this can create a huge advantage/disadvantage for either team, and no-one wants to risk that.

The reason I DISLIKE this role is it's more complicated than it needs to be.

Plz give feedback, and not comments like: "it's too Op".

-CPN Here's what to fix so that I will not reject it again.

-Make it much more simplistic so people understand it and don't create your own trial system.

In fact, that's really it. If that's fixed, then I can add on to the list.