User blog comment:ProfessorArceus/Use of the word REJECTED/@comment-29253708-20171027145156

I’ll be honest here: This is kind of why I stopped reviewing.

I hate seeing every role that has possible potential get instantly rejected by inexperienced reviewers. I’ve seen all of the reviews that were in your pictures, and I know what you’re talking about. It legitimately makes me sad.

There’s been discussion of how the Coven roles break all the rules and such (purposeful exaggeration, mind you), but seriously, all of them work fine. BMG has tested all the roles, and so have all of us.

On that note, I believe and confidently state that we should no longer “reject” roles just because they break the Role Idea Rules. A real role review should include all improvements and issues with the role, not just the obvious problems. New users who do not know the rules or what even is wrong with their idea don’t typically get any advice with their roles in the average review that I’ve seen. Why do people even think that helps?

Test the role out with other roles. Test it in common and even uncommon situations. We’re a catalyst for role idea makers to prepare and learn what’s expected of any role.