Talk:Roles/@comment-26866594-20150912173755/@comment-82.69.76.206-20150916181023

I quite like this idea! I'd suggest a name change to just 'bomber', though. (Or 'Suicide Bomber', but that may not be a good idea on the grounds of 'don't reference terrorists!')

Also, it seems wrong to add a fourth role to the investigation result. I'm sure blankmediagames would rework it how they like it, so it shouldn't be too difficult.

I'd say this is a neutral-evil or neutral-killing role, because they can win without town and they can lose if town wins.

If they don't blow anyone up, do they still win? I guess not, but still. It wasn't all that clear.

My suggestion for a goal is 'Aid the winning team by blowing up their enemies'.

Another small thing is... if someone visits your target, do they die too? I think they should, since you are setting off a bomb. However, only your actual target would count towards your goal. So, say a bomber visits a doctor who revealed themselves. On the same night, a mafioso, disguiser and janitor from a three-man maf visit, attempting to get an easy and helpful disguise. All three maf would die, along with the doctor and yourself. The mafia obviously lose, leaving the town victorious (assuming neutrals were also dead). You would therefore lose, because you sided against the town in blowing one of them up but they won. The town would probably like you for it (since you took out all the maf) but you would still have lost. If the neutrals win, though, you would still win, because the town lost.

Eh, just my thoughts. XD