Board Thread:Townie of the Month/@comment-27575896-20180501201028/@comment-25615841-20180503205338

ZedKiller13 wrote: ProfessorArceus wrote: I voted against 3. Why should users say if the person is eligible? Here you are, trying to restrict ToTM more, and one suggestion is that we get rid of... The one thing which makes sure that users are actually helping? What? Remember, I am not doing anything and was looking at a majority.

All of these can and are supposed to be discussed.

​​​​​​​We could change it as in removing the edit count required, BUT having something following where a user would "sign up" for ToTM, and other users judge how they have been recently for the month including staff, and bias to anyone would be prevented. Basically you would judge on credibility, helpfulness, and use to the wiki for that month(as in mainspace), but we might change a lot there instead. Bias would not be allowed and to "check" you could just look at past posts, edits, and other contributions. That would be interesting, but if it was to happen, imo the judging process should remain anonymous.