Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24675428-20170806011208/@comment-33007077-20170808161923

Anons unite wrote: well ghosty if you say we should change them to smaller words, then anyone can look up the word

This, I really don't care about.

(and you also agreed most people here can understand those words. then why did you make that point in the first place?

'''No, I said most people would NOT understand. And if I did say something like that, I will revise it.'''

i'm saying ''We should have big words because in the odd chance someone does not understand, they can look them up as you said! ''do you agree with that italics statement or not?

'''I don't care much. In the end, you know the word. The big words are more formal, and the smaller ones make things go quicker. Which one would you perfer is the question.'''

You're giving me mixed messages here. but either way, saying you're good at english adds nothing except it seeming like you were boasting, which you weren't, but ppl could read it that way.

'''At the least, it's actually putting in a point, no matter how small. '''

and i think you guys misread my point. i'm not saying ghosty is young or doesn't speak english well, i'm just saying in general. does it honestly look liek i cayre 'bout grammer? eye hardlee yous capatolozatin...... i'm not a grammar nazi '''Okay, that clears that up. (And if the rest of you didn't get that, he said 'I hardly use capitalization') ''' I am glad we are on common ground now.

I didn't intend to brag by saying I was good at English, but you took that one statement too far. Pointing it out in a civil way would have been nice, but there wasn't a need to be rude unless they are talking very irrationally. I was still in my rational zone, so if you'd took that statement with a grain of salt, I would've have taken yours with one as well.

But let's put that aside us, and focus on this suggestion, and let's shake on it to pertend none of this happened

* offers hand*