Board Thread:Debate of The Week/@comment-28112409-20171101070508/@comment-28112409-20171112081921

I vote Team No Tactical, and dear lord. Looking for good points in this debate was like trying to harvest crops in the middle of a desert.

Both sides have witnessed extensive amounts and occassions of:

1- Being edgy, then not bringing up a good point to follow up or miserably failing to do so.

2- Very poor argument structure.

3- Constant mentioning and referencing of the same elements or reasons but never correctly elaborating on them.

4- Derailing off into some other topic and failing to link it sufficiently with the Tactical Mafia concept.

There was so much potential that was wasted on both sides here. No one bothered to properly elaborate on most of their points AND stick to the topic to form a good argument. It almost seemed like everyone was just there to spam reply to whoever argues against them just because they have to or can, it was more like people vomiting all the info they had onto the debate rather than trying to form reliable arguments.

I picked Team No Tactical because they did it less than Team Yes, and that seals this debate with a 3-0.