Board Thread:Role Ideas (Town)/@comment-37991480-20181231173513/@comment-36963837-20181231181653

GibChicken wrote: Name : Seeker

Unique : Yes

Attack : None

Defense : None

Description : You are a sneaky onlooker watching your target’s every move

Tip : If a seeker seeks you and you use your role on someone else, the seeker will know your role.

Alignment : Town (Investigative)

Abilities : At night, choose a target and see what action they take or use on another person

Attributes : 

~ You will not know the name of the person that your target uses their action on '''Yet you could infer this if something was proclaimed the next day (“I was roleblocked!”).

~ If something happens to your target you will find out what happened

~ You may only seek four times '''After this, this role is useless/an extra vote (similar to the, , and even ). I see what could happen if it had unlimited uses, but as a this is a slight issue.'''

Goal : Lynch every criminal and evildoer

~Investigative Results~

'''Sheriff : You cannot find evidence of wrongdoing. Your target seems innocent.'''

Investigator : Your target can be a sheriff, executioner, werewolf, poisoner, or seeker A buff.

'''Consigliere : Your target seeks what actions people use on others. They must be a seeker!'''

~Examples of Seeker’s Investigative Results~

~ Your target roleblocked someone!

~ Your target mauled someone!

~ Your target was healed by a doctor!

~ Your target was killed by a member of the mafia!

I feel like this is a little bit like tracker, but i dont really know. it seems kinda op to me, [moderately] knowing that your target killed someone, but you'd find that out the next day anyway. same thing goes for if your target is roleblocked, they most likely will say so in the chat the following day. let me know if this is too similar to another role, and what i should cut and buff to this. also the name of this role is kinda bad in my opinion so please leave me suggestions. :) This role does and does not fit well in the . A more suitable faction would be for the (I recently reviewed a tracking role that shared the idea of a  and could fit there instead).

It is not similar to the, but rather the s’ bug. It has limited uses— a bit wrong for a, yet it is moderately useful and somewhat balanced (in my opinion), with how the target’s target is anonymous. It adds an extra figure to the ’s bug, which I find fine. Albeit I don’t find this fitting for the.

7/10. Would review again.