FANDOM


  • HAWAIIANpikachu
    HAWAIIANpikachu closed this thread because:
    revived
    20:10, April 23, 2020

    Nobody plays vigilantics, its fun but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Loading editor
    • We should also remove Coven Custom, and Mafia strikes back, because it isnt full.

      Listen, if you wanna play Vigilantics, get a couple of your friends over and some people from the discord, and play vigilantics.

        Loading editor
    • Maf returns is fun tho. 

      So is CC 

      iwish people fucking had coven tho 

        Loading editor
    • Mafia returns is fun. I like it a lot more than the chaos that is coven classic, although thats not to say the chaos isnt fun....

        Loading editor
    • To be fair, vigilantics is incredibly unbalanced. I've played around 20 full games, and none of them had a town win.

      Part of it is that witches require two shots, can confirm each other, and can attack night one.

      While vigis have no confirmability, can't shoot night one, die of guilt, and have no defense.

        Loading editor
    • Atleast it's a better reason than "It's never full."

        Loading editor
    • I think it just needs a rework

      I saw a video at one point that was on the right track

      It had an NK, vet, trans, and a couple others.

      Overall it ended up being a close game, if I remember.

        Loading editor
    • but at least make a different gamemode than vigilantics. Nobody plays it, and Town always loses.

        Loading editor
    • FFF1105 wrote:
      but at least make a different gamemode than vigilantics. Nobody plays it, and Town always loses.

      People play it.

      Those 20 full games were not with friends

      And vigilantics is a cool idea in theory, but terrible in practice/execution (kinda like crus)

        Loading editor
    • NoCarbonRequired wrote:
      I think it just needs a rework

      I saw a video at one point that was on the right track

      It had an NK, vet, trans, and a couple others.

      Overall it ended up being a close game, if I remember.

      I want to see the link.

        Loading editor
    • oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

        Loading editor
    • Hold on like 10 mins then lol

        Loading editor
    • I only had one, and I think it was a town win. (Probably not, I cant remember)

        Loading editor
    • I think I grabbed it

      Can't really tell because of where I am but

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veoCbOGcrgE

      I also scrolled down and found another vid, which I haven't watched yet, it seems legit

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7MePVfZ2PE

        Loading editor
    • FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.

        Loading editor
    • SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.

      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.

        Loading editor
    • MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.

      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.

      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

        Loading editor
    • SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

        Loading editor
    • MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

        Loading editor
    • SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?

        Loading editor
    • MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?

      but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Has 3 games

      ?

        Loading editor
    • SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?
      but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Has 3 games

      ?

      It's usually blank

      I've had a few full games

      I don't think I can get into any anymore, though. I wonder what happened.

        Loading editor
    • NoCarbonRequired wrote:
      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:



      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?
      but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Has 3 games

      ?

      It's usually blank

      I've had a few full games

      I don't think I can get into any anymore, though. I wonder what happened.

      He's exaggerating, but not to the point where he's making a seperate point.

        Loading editor
    • MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      NoCarbonRequired wrote:
      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:



      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?
      but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Has 3 games

      ?

      It's usually blank

      I've had a few full games

      I don't think I can get into any anymore, though. I wonder what happened.

      He's exaggerating, but not to the point where he's making a seperate point.

      I’m gonna test the lobby tomorrow, to see if it is true

        Loading editor
    • SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:

      NoCarbonRequired wrote:
      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:


      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:



      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      MemeDaddy1233 wrote:



      SpacedefenderX wrote:

      FFF1105 wrote: oh Ive only got 3 games in vigilantics, and it SUUKKKED

      Please do not use the opinion and statistic of 1 person to determine the opinion and statistic of the majority.
      But if that person is citing evidence and statictis, shouldnt he be more beleivable? I mean, even if he isnt part of the majority he is still right.
      Yet just because 1 person believes it is bad does not necessarily mean it is bad.

      And the wording is wrong, not wanting to be a grammar Nazi or whatever, the his statement is meaning that he claims that his games of vigilantics suck. And used it to support his point that no one plays vigilantics.

      I mean, from personal experience my one game had the bare minium. But if you want evidence then here.

      https://www.strawpoll.me/11784359/r

      A poll with 1900 people saying what game they are most likely to play. Only one percent said Vigilantics.

      Yet it doesn’t add up

      @FFF1105 how many people were in those games

      What do you mean?
      but the lobby for it is literaly blank All the time

      Has 3 games

      ?

      It's usually blank

      I've had a few full games

      I don't think I can get into any anymore, though. I wonder what happened.

      He's exaggerating, but not to the point where he's making a seperate point.
      I’m gonna test the lobby tomorrow, to see if it is true

      K

        Loading editor
    • Might not happen anymore

      But it might

        Loading editor
    • I propose we end that quote chain

        Loading editor
    • wtf quote chain 

        Loading editor
    • I love Vigilantics. Makes me so sad that I can't play it anymore.....

        Loading editor
    • That was a mass revive, anon.

        Loading editor
    • and this thread is closed

        Loading editor
    • holy shet

        Loading editor
    • yo mama

        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.